A figure needs a source
Prices, fees and payment terms are read off the operator's published commercial pages, and the URL is recorded next to the value. A number with no source does not go on a page, however reasonable it looks.
Where every number comes from
Every price, fee and payment term on this site is recorded against the page it was read from and the date it was checked. Where we have corrected ourselves, we say so on this page rather than quietly.

Every commercial figure on this site — prices, park fees, deposit and balance terms — is held in a single reference file alongside the exact source page it was read from and the date it was verified, so a number cannot appear on a page without a source behind it.

The rules
Short, and each one has cost us a sentence somewhere on this site that read better before we applied it.
The workflow
Four stages. The point of the middle two is that the figure exists in one place, not nine.
Figures come off the operator's own published commercial pages — tier pages for charter rates, the package pages for per-person prices, the entrance-fee page for park charges, the terms and conditions for payment schedules.
The value, the exact URL and a short note go into one reference file. The note says what the figure covers and any caveat — for example that a park fee is a dated ticket valid only for the day printed on it.
Pages draw on that record rather than each carrying its own copy of a number. This is the part that prevents drift: a price cannot be right on the charter page and stale on the cost page, because there is only one of it.
The file carries the date it was last verified and an instruction to re-check before any campaign. Park fees and charter rates move; the honest response is a dated figure rather than an undated promise.
If a figure here disagrees with what you are quoted, the quotation is the one that binds. Rates are confirmed in writing, in USD, for your specific dates and vessel.
Not everything on a site is the same sort of statement, and holding them all to one rule is how pages end up either useless or dishonest.
A licence class, a registry number, a vessel certificate. These are either produced on request or not claimed at all. The company registration and licensing details are on the who-we-are page precisely so you can check them without asking.
Prices, fees, payment terms, booking statistics. Sourced to a published page and dated, as described above. Where we quote the operator's own booking data — median lead times, source markets — we say it is their reservation record and give the sample size.
Which month to sail, whether a charter beats a cabin, whether a week is too long. These are opinions from people who run the trips, and they are written as opinions. Several of them point away from the more expensive option, which is the test of whether they are real.
The failure mode we watch for is a judgement dressed as a figure — "guests rate this 9.2 out of 10 for romance" — which is the sort of sentence that reads like evidence and is not.
This site launched with content whose figures were not reliable. The park entrance fee is approximately USD 40–50 per international visitor and USD 20–25 per Indonesian visitor. The balance was published as due 14 days before departure and is due 30 days before. A day tour was priced at USD 150 per person and is USD 90; a private day charter at USD 1,200 and is USD 800. Charter entry was USD 1,400 a night and is USD 1,550.
A statistic reading "91% of open-trip guests book the 3D2N" appeared in ten places. The figure is real but it is a booking lead-time percentile — 91% of guests had booked at least a month before departure — and says nothing about which format anyone chose. Eight were prose; the last two were credential figures split across fields, so the string "91%" never appeared in the source and the first search missed them.
A page about park access described a daily visitor cap, a named registration system, a per-session cap at Padar and a night-navigation ban, and attached a deposit-refund guarantee to them. None of it could be found on any source we could check. The published constraint is an annual cap with mandatory registration, and the guarantee is gone.
A safety page claimed hull cover above USD 10 million, liability cover to USD 50 million, a named flagship and eight staff marine biologists. A methodology page published two incompatible scoring rubrics on the same screen. Both pages were rebuilt around documents a reader can ask to see.

A stale price, a fee that has moved, a claim that does not match what you were told on the phone. Send it over. We would rather fix it than have it found by somebody standing at a jetty.
+62 811-3823-875
sales@komodoluxury.com